Play

A prospective randomised trial comparing insertion success rate and incidence of catheterisation-related complications for subclavian venous catheterisation using a thin-walled introducer needle or a catheter-over-needle technique

  1. Kim, B. G. Kim, Y. J. Lim, Y. T. Jeon, J. W. Hwang, H. C. Kim, Y. H. Choi and H. P. Park

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.13543

 

Gavin Denton and I discuss this piece of research which tries to establish which needle is best for inserting the central venous catheter into the subclavian vein. The results seem fairly clear in this one. I for one am going to be sticking to my current practice.

Gavin also kindly broke down the research as a quick summary.

Clinical question.

In patient requiring central venous subclavian catheterisation, does a needle over catheter technique increase the success rate of catheterisation and reduce compilations compared to a needle wire approach.

 

Design.

  • Two centre.
  • Single blinded.
  • Randomised (computer randomised).
  • Assignment sealed until the day of surgery.
  • Data collected by third party who was blinded to assignment.
  • Power calculated on a 19% incidence of complications.
  • 80% power calculation, a p value 0.05. N=188 per group, to identify 10% difference.
  • 10% extra recruited to account for drop out (only two dropped out). N=214.

 

Central lineSetting.

Elective neurosurgery.

 

Population.

Elective patients in two South Korean hospitals.

 

Intervention/control.

  • Right subclavian central venous catheterisation.
  • Needle guide wire versus needle canula technique.
  • Two anaesthetist in each hospital performed all canulations, and all had practiced at least 100 central venous canulations.
  • Either landmark or ultrasound technique could be used.
  • The landmark technique was clearly described.

 

Outcome.

  • Primary outcome (catheter related complications). Needle-wire 5.8% vs 15.5% needle-catheter, p.value 0.001.
  • First pass success. Needle-wire 35.4% vs 62% needle-catheter, p.value 0.001
  • Overall canulation success, needle-wire 97% vs 92% needle-catheter, p.value 0.046.
  • Haemotoma, needle-wire 3.8% vs 10.2% needle-catheter, p.value 0.012.
  • Time to canulation, 122 seconds needle-wire vs 101 seconds needle-catheter, p.value 0.002.

 

Author’s conclusion.

Needle-catheter technique causes more complications compared to the needle-wire technique.

 

Strengths.

  • Single blinded, double blinding would be impossible.
  • Experience of clinicians.
  • Minimum number of clinicians limit confounding.
  • Well powered with minimal dropout.

 

Weaknesses.

  • Low BMI in study patients, may limit generalisability to other populations.
  • Elective population, may limit generalisability to patients of greater acuity.
  • May be under powered to detect differences between techniques when ultrasound is used.
  • Does not clearly state if patients were randomised to ultrasound.

 

Bottom line.

 The traditional teaching that needle-catheter central venous subclavian cannulation is easier and has less complications compared to a need wire technique is incorrect and is in fact inferior. Using medcalc and the available figures odds ratio for complications using the needle-catheter is 2.74, absolute risk increase of 8%, and a number needed to harm of 11 assuming a 95% confidence interval.

 

Links.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27396474

 

Podcast LinkPodcast Episode Name
CCP Podcast 001Introduction and Interview with Teresa Chinn from @WeNurses
CCP Podcast 002Twitter, Google Hang Outs and Speakpipe
CCP Podcast 003Interview with Robin Davies, Lead Resuscitation Officer
CCP Podcast 004Great Medical Podcasts to Listen To
CCP Podcast 005Chat with Ken Spearpoint
CCP Podcast 006Chat with David Barton
CCP Podcast 007Chat with Bethan Bishop
CCP Podcast 008Chat with Claire Flatt
CCP Podcast 009SMACC Me Hard!
CCP Podcast 010Cricoid Pressure: Do it? Do it right? Or do it at all?
CCP Podcast 011Social Media...Use it, don't abuse it!
CCP Podcast 012Get my feet to the floor...please!
CCP Podcast 013Mind and Body
CCP Podcast 014How Much Fluid?
CCP Podcast 015The Power of Practitioners?
CCP Podcast 016The Strong Arm of Eric...YouTube Learning.
CCP Podcast 017Simon is one of the First 2 Act
CCP Podcast 018Mechanical Ventilation...
CCP Podcast 019SepsisPAM analysed. Gav and Jonathan try to work it out!
CCP Podcast 020More Power to Practitioners
CCP Podcast 021Jesse's Show
CCP Podcast 022ACPs Education, Education, Education.
CCP Podcast 023Wash Your Mouth Out!!
CCP Podcast 024Mechanical Ventilation...the basics
CCP Podcast 025Teresa Gets A Gong!
CCP Podcast 026Crew Resource Management...What?
CCP Podcast 027Crew Resource Management Continued
CCP Podcast 028James DuCanto Talks Intubation
CCP Podcast 029Mechanical Ventilation...Phases of the Breath
CCP Podcast 030SMACC it!
CCP Podcast 031Lifesaver to Lightsabre!
CCP Podcast 032Hello South Africa!
CCP Podcast 033Calling all students...
CCP Podcast 034Mechanical Ventilation...Types of breath
CCP Podcast 0355 Tips for Better Presentations
CCP Podcast 036Head of Bed Elevation and Reflux
CCP Podcast 037How to Make Ultrasound Easier!
CCP Podcast 038WeNurses Tweet Chat About Advanced Practitioners
CCP Podcast 039Early Mobilisation- Get Them Moving!
CCP Podcast 040Why Won't We Change?
CCP Podcast 041PTSD in Critical Care
CCP Podcast 042What angle should I sit my patient at?
CCP Podcast 043Why won't my patient sleep?
CCP Podcast 044Helping the ITU patient sleep
CCP Podcast 045Simple Things to Help them Sleep
CCP Podcast 046PTSD in Critical Care II
CCP Podcast 047Advanced Critical Care Practitioner
CCP Podcast 048RSI- Which Drug?
CCP Podcast 049Central Venous Catheter- Which Needle?
CCP Podcast 050LeoPARDS Trial
CCP Podcast 051ICU Follow Up Clinics
CCP Podcast 052Chronic Critical Illness
CCP Podcast 053Nutrition Guidelines
CCP Podcast 054Nutrition Guidelines at ICSSOA 2016
CCP Podcast 055Papers of the Month
CCP Podcast 056Got to help them cough
CCP Podcast 057Papers of the Month
CCP Podcast 058Early Mobilisation. Do we know it works?
CCP Podcast 059Surviving the ICU: The Patient Experience.
CCP Podcast 060My Critical Care Patient Can't Swallow! Why?
CCP Podcast 061Papers of the Month: March 2017
CCP Podcast 062Escalate the Patient!
CCP Podcast 063The Two Jonnys Do Twitter: May 2017
CCP Podcast 064Papers of the Month May 2017
CCP Podcast 065ACCP Presentation- What, Why, How?
CCP Podcast 066The Two Jonnys Do Twitter: May 2017 (2)
CCP Podcast 067Papers of the Month June 2017
CCP Podcast 068The Two Jonnys Do Twitter: June 2017
CCP Podcast 069DasSMACC Day 1
CCP Podcast 070DasSMACC Day 2
CCP Podcast 071DasSMACC Day 3
CCP Podcast 072The Two Jonnys Do Twitter: July 2017
CCP Podcast 073Bariatric Surgery in the Management of the Obese Patient
CCP Podcast 074Lung Ultrasound with SonoPhysio
CCP Podcast 075ACP Conference October 2017
CCP Podcast 076The Two Jonnys Septmber 2017

CCP Podcast 077NCEPOD 2017 Acute NIV
CCP Podcast 078NCEPOD 2017 Acute NIV- A Discussion
CCP Podcast 079The Two Jonnys November 2017
CCP Podcast 080Nitin does FICE….quickly!
CCP Podcast 081The Two Jonnys at ICSSOA 2017 (and Dave)

Originally posted 2016-09-15 21:14:37. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Share →

2 Responses to CCP Podcast 049: Central Venous Catheter- Which Needle?

  1. Tim says:

    So just curious if you have the full article available. Would be interested to read in entirety as I’m curious of the 15% complications were they relatively minor or more severe (excluding the two PTX). As a relatively new Critical Care N.P. with about 50 CVC lines under my belt I’ve never actually used the catheter over needle and Subclavian lines are rare for us as well. I wonder however, as my population sounds similar to what you describe as yours on the podcast, that if the rate of complications would be similar with my typical IJ under US. Also, I have found in my limited experience that the most difficult patients seem to be the potentially hypovolemic/hypotensive patients in which there IJ readily collapses and very small movement or pressures can easily cause the needle tip to migrate out of the vessel.. I would be curious to see if the needle over catheter would have a better showing in that patient population in which now a catheter could be advanced and would be better situated in the vessel during wire advancement vs the occasional inadvertent withdrawal when advancing the wire through the needle. Just some thoughts.. Enjoy the podcast as it is always nice to see what similar level of practitioner are doing in other areas/countries.

    • Jonathan Downham says:

      Hi Tim.I am afraid I don’t have access to the full article other than through Athens. I agree with some of your points and when reading the article some of those were not necessarily addressed. Personally, as I said in the podcast, I am going to stick with the thin walled needle. Glad you enjoy the podcasts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *